Preparing for the CIMA Strategic Case Study November 2026 or February 2027 exam?
One of the biggest challenges is deciding which technical topics to revise.
E3, P3 and F3 cover a wide range of subjects, but students have limited preparation time.
The Vennlisk pre-seen provides useful clues about the company’s business challenges, including competition, artificial intelligence, employee management, operational risks and financial decisions.
These create opportunities to connect technical knowledge with realistic business situations.
Important: The topics below are Keystone Academia’s suggested revision priorities based on the Vennlisk case. They are not predictions of what CIMA will examine.
Free CIMA SCS Mini Course
Join our Free SCS WhatsApp Community
How Should You Approach Vennlisk SCS Revision?
In the Strategic Case Study, you act as a senior manager in Vennlisk’s finance function, advising the Board on strategic matters.
Your answers should explain:
- What is happening at Vennlisk?
- Why does it matter?
- What are the strategic and financial consequences?
- What risks should management consider?
- What should the Board do?
A strong answer often combines E3, P3 and F3 rather than treating them as completely separate subjects.
Part 1: E3 – Strategic Management
E3 is particularly relevant because Vennlisk operates in a competitive industry experiencing technological change.
1. Competitive Strategy
Revision priority: High
Vennlisk faces competition from domestic providers, including Ringcoll, and overseas call centres with lower labour costs.
The company differentiates itself through trained agents and high-quality customer service.
Topics to revise: Competitive advantage, cost leadership, differentiation, Porter’s Five Forces, SWOT, PESTEL and strategic positioning.
Vennlisk application: Suppose an overseas competitor offers a major client a significantly lower price.
Vennlisk should not automatically match the price. Management should assess contract profitability and whether its service-quality advantage justifies a higher price.
2. Digital Strategy and AI
Revision priority: High
Vennlisk is evaluating AI to support agents by providing information, identifying caller stress and analysing performance patterns.
Topics to revise: Digital strategy, digital transformation, innovation, technology-enabled competitive advantage and implementation.
Vennlisk application: AI could improve productivity, but excessive automation could undermine the quality-focused strategy.
The Board should evaluate whether the technology improves customer service as well as efficiency.
3. Strategic Change Management
Revision priority: High
Vennlisk employs approximately 5,000 agents. Major technology changes could affect employee responsibilities and working practices.
Topics to revise: Change management, resistance to change, leadership, organisational culture, communication and stakeholder engagement.
Vennlisk application: Employees may become concerned about AI-based performance monitoring or changes to their roles.
Management should communicate clearly, involve employees and provide appropriate training.
4. Strategic Options and Evaluation
Revision priority: High
Vennlisk may face strategic decisions involving technology, acquisitions, growth or expansion.
Topics to revise: Ansoff’s matrix, strategic options, Suitability, Acceptability and Feasibility (SAF), and implementation planning.
Vennlisk application: If the company considers acquiring another call-centre operator, the Board should assess strategic benefits, financing requirements and integration risks.
A strategically attractive acquisition may still be financially unacceptable or difficult to implement.
5. Stakeholder Management
Revision priority: Medium–High
Vennlisk must balance the interests of shareholders, employees, clients, callers and other stakeholders.
Topics to revise: Mendelow’s matrix, stakeholder conflicts, stakeholder engagement and corporate responsibility.
Vennlisk application: AI could improve profitability but create employee concerns and customer-experience risks.
The Board should identify these competing interests and develop appropriate responses.
Part 2: P3 – Risk Management
P3 is important because the pre-seen identifies several principal operational risks.
6. Enterprise Risk Management
Revision priority: High
Vennlisk’s principal risks include retaining trained agents, employee demotivation, health and safety, privacy and telecommunications disruption.
Topics to revise: Risk identification, likelihood and impact, risk appetite, risk responses, monitoring and reporting.
Vennlisk application: If employee turnover increases, management should investigate the causes and assess recruitment costs, training expenditure and service-quality implications.
A useful exam structure is:
Risk → Cause → Impact → Mitigation → Monitoring
7. Cybersecurity and Data Privacy
Revision priority: High
Vennlisk handles client information, and privacy is identified as a principal risk.
The pre-seen confirms that agents receive extensive privacy training and refresher courses.
Topics to revise: Cyber risk, information security, internal controls, data protection, business continuity and incident response.
Vennlisk application: A privacy incident could damage client trust and threaten commercial relationships.
Management should consider appropriate access controls, monitoring and incident-response arrangements.
These are recommended measures, not evidence that Vennlisk’s current systems are deficient.
8. Project and Implementation Risk
Revision priority: High
A major AI project could involve substantial implementation uncertainty.
Topics to revise: Project governance, risk registers, contingency planning, project monitoring and benefits realisation.
Vennlisk application: AI implementation could experience delays, integration problems or cost overruns.
The Board should establish clear milestones, budgets and responsibilities.
A pilot programme could help identify problems before wider implementation.
9. Corporate Governance and Internal Controls
Revision priority: Medium–High
Vennlisk has a Board supported by committees covering audit, risk and sustainability, remuneration and nominations.
Topics to revise: Board responsibilities, executive and non-executive directors, audit committees, internal audit, risk oversight and internal controls.
Vennlisk application: Following a major cyber incident, the Board would need to ensure that management responds appropriately and addresses control weaknesses.
The relevant committees could support oversight and assurance.
10. Business Continuity and Operational Resilience
Revision priority: Medium–High
Vennlisk depends on reliable telecommunications infrastructure.
The pre-seen identifies service interruption and reduced call quality as possible consequences of telecommunications failures.
Topics to revise: Business-continuity planning, disaster recovery, operational resilience, supplier risk and contingency arrangements.
Vennlisk application: A prolonged telecommunications failure could reduce Service Level, increase abandoned calls and damage client relationships.
Management should evaluate backup arrangements, recovery procedures and regular testing.
Part 3: F3 – Financial Strategy
F3 is particularly relevant because Vennlisk is a quoted company with significant assets, borrowings and financing commitments.
11. Investment Appraisal
Revision priority: High
Vennlisk may need to evaluate investments in AI, technology, infrastructure or acquisitions.
Topics to revise: Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), discount rates, relevant cash flows, sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis.
Vennlisk application: Before approving an AI investment, the Board should evaluate initial costs, expected savings, additional revenue, maintenance and implementation risks.
A positive NPV may support an investment, but management should also consider strategic and non-financial consequences.
12. Financing and Capital Structure
Revision priority: High
Vennlisk has substantial borrowings and finance costs.
The draft’s financial figures for the year ended 30 September 2026 are:
| Financial item | W$ million |
|---|---|
| Revenue | 12,370.0 |
| Operating profit | 1,451.0 |
| Finance costs | 436.8 |
| Profit for the year | 770.8 |
| Non-current borrowings | 5,460.0 |
| Total equity | 8,253.1 |
Finance costs represent approximately 30.1% of operating profit.
This indicates that financing commitments are an important consideration when evaluating new investments.
Topics to revise: Debt and equity financing, gearing, capital structure, cost of capital, financial flexibility and financing risk.
Vennlisk application: Additional borrowing could finance an investment but increase interest obligations and financial risk.
Equity financing could avoid additional interest payments but dilute existing shareholders.
The Board should evaluate the appropriate funding mix.
13. Business Valuation and Shareholder Value
Revision priority: High
Vennlisk is a quoted company, and its share-price history indicates that investors are concerned about its competitive prospects.
Topics to revise: Discounted cash-flow valuation, earnings-based valuation, market-based valuation, shareholder value and valuation uncertainty.
Vennlisk application: Successful AI implementation could improve expectations of future cash flows.
However, implementation failure or deteriorating service quality could have the opposite effect.
The Board should focus on sustainable value creation rather than short-term accounting profit alone.
14. Acquisitions and Business Combinations
Revision priority: Medium–High
Vennlisk has grown through organic expansion and acquisitions.
Its financial statements also contain substantial goodwill and intangible assets.
Topics to revise: Acquisition valuation, synergies, due diligence, acquisition financing, integration risk and goodwill impairment.
Vennlisk application: Acquiring another call-centre operator could increase market share or provide new capabilities.
However, the Board should assess whether expected synergies are realistic and whether the acquisition would create excessive financial or operational risk.
15. Dividend Policy
Revision priority: Medium
Vennlisk paid dividends of W$509.6 million during 2026, compared with profit for the year of W$770.8 million.
This represents approximately 66.1% of annual profit.
It is a comparison with accounting profit, not a cash-flow payout ratio.
Topics to revise: Dividend policy, retained earnings, shareholder expectations, liquidity and investment requirements.
Vennlisk application: The Board may need to balance shareholder distributions against investment in technology, employee training and sustainability.
Reducing dividends could preserve funds for investment but disappoint shareholders who value regular income.
Vennlisk SCS Revision Priority Table
The following rankings are Keystone Academia’s recommendations based on the pre-seen, not CIMA exam predictions.
| Topic | Pillar | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive strategy | E3 | High |
| AI and digital strategy | E3 | High |
| Change management | E3 | High |
| Strategic options and evaluation | E3 | High |
| Stakeholder management | E3 | Medium–High |
| Enterprise risk management | P3 | High |
| Privacy and cybersecurity | P3 | High |
| Project and implementation risk | P3 | High |
| Governance and internal controls | P3 | Medium–High |
| Business continuity | P3 | Medium–High |
| Investment appraisal | F3 | High |
| Financing and capital structure | F3 | High |
| Valuation and shareholder value | F3 | High |
| Acquisitions | F3 | Medium–High |
| Dividend policy | F3 | Medium |
Important: A lower revision priority does not mean that a topic cannot appear in the examination. Students should maintain broad syllabus coverage.
How E3, P3 and F3 Work Together
Consider a hypothetical AI investment at Vennlisk.
| E3 – Strategy | P3 – Risk | F3 – Finance |
|---|---|---|
| Does AI support Vennlisk’s strategy? | Could the system fail? | Does the investment have a positive NPV? |
| How will employees respond? | How will privacy be protected? | How will the project be financed? |
| Can AI improve competitiveness? | What controls are required? | What happens if savings are lower than expected? |
| How should implementation be managed? | How will risks be monitored? | Will the investment create shareholder value? |
A strong SCS answer should bring these perspectives together.
For example:
Vennlisk could benefit from AI if it improves productivity and supports its quality-focused strategy. However, the Board should require a financial appraisal based on realistic cash-flow assumptions and sensitivity analysis. Privacy, employee acceptance and implementation risks should also be assessed. A controlled pilot would help management evaluate the benefits before approving a wider rollout.
This is stronger than treating E3, P3 and F3 as separate textbook subjects.
A Practical Vennlisk Revision Method
Instead of revising technical topics in isolation, connect them to a business issue.
| Vennlisk business issue | Topics to revise |
|---|---|
| AI investment | Investment appraisal, digital strategy, project risk and change management |
| Employee turnover | People management, operational risk and financial consequences |
| Major acquisition | Strategic evaluation, valuation, financing and due diligence |
| Privacy incident | Cyber risk, internal controls, governance and business continuity |
| Competitive pressure | Competitive strategy, pricing, profitability and strategic options |
This approach helps students practise applying technical knowledge to unfamiliar unseen developments.
Common Revision Mistakes to Avoid
1. Memorising Frameworks Without Application
Knowing Porter’s Five Forces is not enough.
You must explain how competitive rivalry affects Vennlisk’s pricing, margins and strategic choices.
2. Ignoring Financial Consequences
Even when a question focuses on strategy or risk, financial implications may be important.
For example, employee turnover could increase recruitment costs and threaten client revenue.
3. Assuming AI Will Definitely Appear
AI is a useful preparation area because it is discussed in the pre-seen.
However, the unseen could introduce a completely different strategic issue.
4. Describing Risks Without Recommendations
A strong answer should explain how Vennlisk can respond to an identified risk.
5. Writing Generic Answers
Avoid statements such as:
Vennlisk should improve communication.
Instead, explain who management should communicate with, why communication matters and what the expected benefit would be.
Final Thoughts
The Vennlisk pre-seen provides useful connections with E3, P3 and F3.
For E3, competitive strategy, AI, strategic options and change management deserve focused practice.
For P3, principal risks, privacy, cybersecurity, governance and project implementation are important.
For F3, investment appraisal, financing, shareholder value and acquisitions provide useful case applications.
However, the most important skill is not remembering which technical topic belongs to which syllabus pillar.
It is understanding how these areas interact when Vennlisk faces a business decision.
As you revise, keep asking: What should Vennlisk’s Board do, and why?
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Which E3 topics should I prioritise for Vennlisk?
Competitive strategy, digital strategy, change management, strategic options and stakeholder management are useful preparation areas.
2. Which P3 topics are most relevant?
Enterprise risk management, privacy, cybersecurity, project risk, internal controls, governance and business continuity.
3. Which F3 topics should I revise?
Investment appraisal, financing, capital structure, shareholder value, acquisitions and dividend policy.
4. Is AI guaranteed to appear in the Vennlisk SCS exam?
No. AI is explicitly discussed in the pre-seen, but the unseen developments cannot be predicted.
5. Should I revise all three pillars?
Yes. Maintain broad coverage of E3, P3 and F3. Use the pre-seen to guide additional practice, not to exclude syllabus topics.
6. How should I apply technical knowledge in the exam?
Use the structure:
Point → Vennlisk application → Business consequence → Recommendation
7. Is the Vennlisk pre-seen the same for November 2026 and February 2027?
The published pre-seen covers the November 2026–February 2027 examination cycle.
Continue Your Vennlisk SCS Preparation
Understanding the technical syllabus is only the starting point.
The next step is practising how these topics apply to Vennlisk’s strategic and financial challenges.
Explore Keystone Academia’s Vennlisk articles covering AI, financial performance, corporate governance, stakeholders, sustainability and risk management.
Free CIMA SCS Mini Course
Join our Free SCS WhatsApp Community