CIMA Strategic Case Study | E3, P3 and F3 | Hypothetical Unseen Developments
What could happen in the Vennlisk CIMA Strategic Case Study exam?
The pre-seen introduces Vennlisk’s business, competitors, employees, financial performance and principal risks. However, the actual exam will provide new information that students must evaluate.
You could be asked to advise the Board on an investment, a major client contract, an operational problem or a strategic decision.
The challenge is not simply identifying the relevant topic. It is explaining what the development means for Vennlisk and recommending what management should do.
This guide provides 20 hypothetical Vennlisk SCS scenarios to help students practise applying E3, P3 and F3 knowledge.
Important: These are original Keystone Academia practice scenarios, not official CIMA unseen material or predictions of exam questions.
Free CIMA SCS Mini Course
Join our Free SCS WhatsApp Community
Why These Scenarios Matter
Vennlisk is a quoted company in Westland providing outsourced inbound-call services.
It operates five call centres, employs approximately 5,000 agents and competes with domestic providers such as Ringcoll and lower-cost overseas competitors.
The pre-seen also identifies employee retention, motivation, privacy and telecommunications dependence as important risks. Vennlisk is evaluating AI to support and manage its agents.
These facts provide useful foundations for practising possible business developments.
The scenarios below introduce fictional circumstances to help you develop your exam technique.
Scenario 1: A Major AI Investment Proposal
Syllabus links: E3, P3, F3
Hypothetical development: A technology supplier proposes an AI platform that provides real-time guidance to Vennlisk’s agents. The supplier claims it could reduce Average Handle Time and improve First Call Resolution, but implementation would require significant expenditure and training.
Possible exam requirement: Advise the Board on whether to proceed with the investment.
Points to discuss:
- Whether AI supports Vennlisk’s competitive strategy.
- Initial costs, ongoing expenditure, realistic cash savings and NPV.
- Privacy, implementation risks and employee acceptance.
- Effects on customer satisfaction and service quality.
Suggested recommendation: Begin with a controlled pilot and approve wider implementation only if financial and operational results justify it.
Scenario 2: AI Chatbots Replace Routine Human Calls
Syllabus links: E3, P3
Hypothetical development: Vennlisk considers introducing chatbots to handle routine customer enquiries. Management expects cost savings, but some clients are concerned about the customer experience.
Possible exam requirement: Evaluate the strategic and operational implications of automation.
Points to discuss:
- Faster responses and potentially lower handling costs.
- Reduced demand on human agents.
- Risks of incorrect answers or frustrated callers.
- The importance of human support for complex enquiries.
Suggested recommendation: Use a hybrid approach, allowing customers to reach human agents when necessary. Monitor Customer Satisfaction and First Call Resolution.
Scenario 3: A Major Client Threatens to Leave
Syllabus links: E3, F3
Hypothetical development: A major client receives a lower-priced offer from an overseas call-centre provider and asks Vennlisk to reduce its contract price.
Possible exam requirement: Recommend how Vennlisk should respond.
Points to discuss:
- Current contract profitability and strategic importance.
- Potential revenue and contribution lost if the client leaves.
- Whether Vennlisk’s service quality justifies a premium.
- Alternatives such as productivity improvements or revised service arrangements.
Suggested recommendation: Negotiate using evidence of service quality and contract profitability rather than automatically matching the lower price.
Scenario 4: Ringcoll Wins an Important Contract
Syllabus links: E3, F3
Hypothetical development: Ringcoll wins a major contract that Vennlisk expected to secure.
Possible exam requirement: Advise the Board on the competitive implications.
Points to discuss:
- Why Vennlisk lost the contract.
- Differences in pricing, service, technology and client requirements.
- Possible weaknesses in Vennlisk’s competitive position.
- Improvements that could strengthen future bids.
Suggested recommendation: Investigate the reasons for the lost contract before changing Vennlisk’s pricing or strategy.
Scenario 5: Employee Turnover Increases
Syllabus links: E3, P3, F3
Hypothetical development: Agent resignations increase significantly at one call centre. Exit interviews indicate dissatisfaction with workloads and career progression.
Possible exam requirement: Evaluate the risks and recommend action.
Points to discuss:
- Higher recruitment and training costs.
- Loss of experienced employees.
- Potential deterioration in customer service.
- Employee motivation, workload and development opportunities.
Suggested recommendation: Investigate the causes, introduce targeted retention measures and monitor turnover alongside service-quality KPIs.
Scenario 6: Customer Satisfaction Falls Despite Faster Calls
Syllabus links: E3, P3
Hypothetical development: Average Handle Time decreases, but Customer Satisfaction and First Call Resolution also decline.
Possible exam requirement: Evaluate the performance-management problem.
Points to discuss:
- Agents may be rushing calls.
- Poor First Call Resolution could increase repeat enquiries.
- Productivity targets may be encouraging inappropriate behaviour.
- Faster calls do not necessarily mean better service.
Suggested recommendation: Review incentives, monitor call quality and use balanced KPIs rather than focusing only on Average Handle Time.
Scenario 7: A Client Data Breach
Syllabus links: P3, E3
Hypothetical development: Confidential information relating to a banking client is accessed without authorisation.
Possible exam requirement: Advise the Board on the immediate response and longer-term controls.
Points to discuss:
- Containing and investigating the incident.
- Legal and contractual notification obligations.
- Client communication and reputational consequences.
- Access controls, monitoring and employee training.
Suggested recommendation: Prioritise containment, assess notification obligations and investigate the cause before strengthening relevant controls.
Scenario 8: A Ransomware Attack Disrupts Operations
Syllabus links: P3, F3
Hypothetical development: A cyberattack prevents agents at one call centre from accessing essential systems.
Possible exam requirement: Evaluate the operational and financial consequences.
Points to discuss:
- Service interruption and potential contractual consequences.
- Recovery costs and possible lost revenue.
- Business-continuity arrangements.
- Secure system recovery and client communication.
Suggested recommendation: Activate the incident-response and business-continuity arrangements, restore services securely and investigate control weaknesses.
Scenario 9: Telecommunications Failure
Syllabus links: P3
Hypothetical development: A telecommunications provider experiences a prolonged outage affecting one of Vennlisk’s centres.
Possible exam requirement: Recommend management’s response.
Points to discuss:
- Interrupted calls and reduced Service Level.
- Increased Call Abandonment Rate.
- Potential effects on client relationships.
- Backup arrangements and supplier resilience.
Suggested recommendation: Coordinate recovery with the provider, use alternative arrangements where available and review business-continuity planning.
Scenario 10: Acquisition of a Smaller Call-Centre Operator
Syllabus links: E3, F3, P3
Hypothetical development: Vennlisk has an opportunity to acquire a smaller domestic call-centre operator with attractive client relationships but outdated technology.
Possible exam requirement: Evaluate the proposed acquisition.
Points to discuss:
- Strategic fit and expected synergies.
- Valuation and acquisition financing.
- Technology investment and integration costs.
- Employee retention and contract quality.
Suggested recommendation: Complete detailed commercial, financial and operational due diligence before committing to the acquisition.
Scenario 11: Expansion Into an Overseas Market
Syllabus links: E3, P3, F3
Hypothetical development: Vennlisk’s Board considers opening an overseas operation to benefit from lower labour costs.
Possible exam requirement: Evaluate the proposed international expansion.
Points to discuss:
- Potential labour-cost savings.
- Recruitment, training and operational capacity.
- Foreign exchange, regulatory and cultural risks.
- Whether the operation can maintain Vennlisk’s service standards.
Suggested recommendation: Undertake a full strategic and financial feasibility study before making a major investment.
Scenario 12: A Major New Client Contract
Syllabus links: E3, F3, P3
Hypothetical development: Vennlisk is invited to tender for a large healthcare-sector contract requiring additional agents, specialist training and technology.
Possible exam requirement: Advise the Board on whether to bid.
Points to discuss:
- Incremental revenue and full contract costs.
- Recruitment and training capacity.
- Privacy and specialist service requirements.
- Effects on existing clients and operational resources.
Suggested recommendation: Submit a bid only if the expected returns justify the required investment and operational commitments.
Scenario 13: A Client Demands Tougher Performance Targets
Syllabus links: E3, P3, F3
Hypothetical development: A major client requests stricter Service Level and Customer Satisfaction targets, with financial penalties for underperformance.
Possible exam requirement: Evaluate the proposed contract amendments.
Points to discuss:
- Whether the targets are achievable.
- Additional staffing or technology costs.
- Potential penalties and financial exposure.
- Operational capacity and service-quality implications.
Suggested recommendation: Negotiate realistic targets supported by operational data and an assessment of the financial risks.
Scenario 14: Dependence on an AI Supplier
Syllabus links: P3, E3, F3
Hypothetical development: Vennlisk considers signing a long-term contract with an AI supplier whose system would be difficult to replace after implementation.
Possible exam requirement: Evaluate the supplier risks.
Points to discuss:
- Supplier lock-in and future pricing.
- System reliability and availability.
- Data protection and contractual responsibilities.
- Termination rights and transition arrangements.
Suggested recommendation: Carry out supplier due diligence, compare alternatives and negotiate appropriate contractual protections.
Scenario 15: A Major Employee Training Programme
Syllabus links: E3, F3
Hypothetical development: HR proposes additional training in empathy, complaint handling and specialist client knowledge.
Possible exam requirement: Evaluate whether the Board should approve the programme.
Points to discuss:
- Potential improvements in customer satisfaction.
- Training costs and lost productive time.
- Employee development and retention.
- Effects on First Call Resolution and client relationships.
Suggested recommendation: Approve a targeted programme with measurable objectives and regular evaluation of results.
Scenario 16: A New Performance-Based Reward Scheme
Syllabus links: E3, P3
Hypothetical development: Management proposes bonuses based mainly on the number of calls handled per shift.
Possible exam requirement: Evaluate the reward scheme.
Points to discuss:
- Incentives to increase call volumes.
- Risks of rushed conversations.
- Potential deterioration in First Call Resolution.
- Employee motivation and customer experience.
Suggested recommendation: Use a balanced reward system incorporating efficiency, service quality and appropriate employee behaviour.
Scenario 17: A Sustainability Investment
Syllabus links: E3, P3, F3
Hypothetical development: Vennlisk considers installing renewable-energy equipment at its call centres.
Possible exam requirement: Evaluate the financial and strategic implications.
Points to discuss:
- Initial investment and future energy savings.
- NPV and financing requirements.
- Environmental benefits and sustainability targets.
- Implementation risks and possible disruption.
Suggested recommendation: Evaluate both financial and environmental benefits before approving the investment.
Scenario 18: A Change to Dividend Policy
Syllabus links: F3, E3
Hypothetical development: The Board considers reducing dividends to retain more cash for technology investment.
Possible exam requirement: Advise on the proposed dividend policy.
Points to discuss:
- Liquidity and investment requirements.
- Shareholder expectations.
- Potential returns from retained funds.
- Investor confidence and communication.
Suggested recommendation: Consider a reduction if the retained funds can support value-creating investment, with a clear explanation to shareholders.
Scenario 19: A Large Debt-Financed Investment
Syllabus links: F3, P3
Hypothetical development: Vennlisk proposes funding a major strategic investment entirely through additional borrowing.
Possible exam requirement: Evaluate the financing decision.
Points to discuss:
- Existing borrowings and finance costs.
- Future cash-flow commitments.
- Interest and refinancing risks.
- Alternative financing methods.
Suggested recommendation: Compare debt, equity, internal cash and phased financing before selecting an appropriate funding structure.
Scenario 20: A Major Client Questions AI Monitoring
Syllabus links: E3, P3
Hypothetical development: During an AI pilot, a major client questions how recorded calls are processed and whether AI-generated recommendations are reliable.
Possible exam requirement: Advise the Board on governance and stakeholder implications.
Points to discuss:
- Privacy and transparency.
- Accuracy and reliability of AI recommendations.
- Client contracts and data-processing arrangements.
- Human oversight and escalation procedures.
Suggested recommendation: Investigate the concerns, strengthen relevant safeguards and decide whether the pilot should continue, be modified or be paused.
How to Practise These 20 Scenarios
Do not simply read the scenarios and memorise the suggested recommendations.
For each scenario, practise five steps:
- Identify the decision. What is the Board being asked to approve, reject or manage?
- Apply Vennlisk facts. Use relevant information from the pre-seen.
- Evaluate the consequences. Consider financial, strategic, operational and stakeholder effects.
- Exercise judgement. Compare benefits and risks rather than giving one-sided arguments.
- Recommend action. Explain what management should do and why.
A strong response does not need to mention every theory. It needs to answer the specific requirement using relevant technical knowledge.
Example: Turning a Scenario Into an SCS Answer
Consider Scenario 6, where Average Handle Time improves but Customer Satisfaction declines.
Weak answer:
Vennlisk should improve customer service and train its employees.
Stronger answer:
Although reducing Average Handle Time may improve Vennlisk’s capacity, the simultaneous decline in First Call Resolution and Customer Satisfaction suggests that agents may be ending calls before resolving customer problems.
This could generate repeat calls, undermine Vennlisk’s quality-focused strategy and threaten client relationships.
Management should review call quality, investigate performance incentives and provide targeted coaching. The Board should monitor these KPIs together rather than treating shorter calls as evidence of improved overall performance.
This demonstrates business application, consequences and professional judgement.
Which Scenarios Should You Practise First?
| Preparation area | Scenarios |
|---|---|
| AI and digital strategy | 1, 2, 14, 20 |
| Competition and contracts | 3, 4, 12, 13 |
| Employees and service quality | 5, 6, 15, 16 |
| Risk and operational resilience | 7, 8, 9 |
| Growth and investment | 10, 11, 17 |
| Financing and shareholder value | 18, 19 |
These groupings are for revision convenience and do not indicate the likelihood of examination questions.
Three Common Mistakes in Unseen Scenario Practice
1. Treating Hypothetical Scenarios as Pre-Seen Facts
The pre-seen confirms that Vennlisk is evaluating AI.
It does not confirm that Vennlisk has experienced a cyberattack, announced redundancies or approved a major AI rollout.
Always distinguish confirmed facts from hypothetical developments.
2. Giving Generic Recommendations
Statements such as Vennlisk should improve training are not enough.
Explain what training is needed, who requires it, why it matters and how success should be measured.
3. Ignoring Financial Consequences
In the SCS, you are advising from a senior finance management perspective.
Even when a scenario appears operational, consider costs, cash flows, contract profitability, investment requirements and shareholder value.
For example, a telecommunications outage is not simply an IT issue. It could also create recovery costs and threaten future client revenue.
Final Thoughts
The Vennlisk pre-seen provides several useful areas for scenario practice.
AI, competition, employees, privacy, operational KPIs, acquisitions, financing and sustainability can all create realistic business decisions.
However, the objective is not to guess the exact unseen material.
It is to become confident advising Vennlisk’s Board when new information changes the business situation.
For every scenario, ask: What matters most, what are the financial consequences, what risks need managing and what should the Board do next?
That is the mindset required for effective CIMA Strategic Case Study preparation.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Are these official CIMA SCS unseen scenarios?
No. They are original hypothetical practice scenarios developed by Keystone Academia using Vennlisk’s business context.
2. Can these scenarios predict the November 2026 exam?
No. They help students practise relevant business decisions but cannot predict the examination.
3. What AI scenarios should I practise for Vennlisk?
AI investment, chatbots, supplier dependence, employee monitoring and privacy concerns are useful preparation areas.
4. Could Vennlisk face an acquisition scenario?
An acquisition is a plausible practice development because Vennlisk has a history of growth through acquisitions. It is not a confirmed future event.
5. How should I answer a Vennlisk unseen question?
Identify the decision, apply relevant pre-seen facts, evaluate consequences and provide a justified recommendation.
6. Should I use E3, P3 and F3 in every answer?
Use whichever technical knowledge is relevant to the requirement. Avoid forcing unnecessary theory into your answer.
7. Is this useful for February 2027 preparation?
Yes. These scenarios use the Vennlisk pre-seen for the November 2026–February 2027 examination cycle.
Continue Your Vennlisk SCS Preparation
Scenario practice is most effective when combined with financial analysis, syllabus revision and exam-answer technique.
Explore Keystone Academia’s Vennlisk resources to strengthen your ability to evaluate strategic decisions and make Board-level recommendations.
Free CIMA SCS Mini Course
Join our Free SCS WhatsApp Community